Jesse Skeen
My feedback
4 results found
-
1 vote2 comments · CLOSED: How should media companies change their approaches to delivering news and information? · Admin →
An error occurred while saving the comment -
38 votes17 comments · CLOSED: How should media companies change their approaches to delivering news and information? · Admin →
An error occurred while saving the comment As long as most cable channels show commercials AND "Paid Programming", I see no logical reason to pay for cable. Commercials have always been on broadcast TV because they are what pays for the programming- with cable they're getting money from advertisers AND viewers, and that is just plain wrong.
-
1 vote1 comment · CLOSED: How should media companies change their approaches to delivering news and information? · Admin →
An error occurred while saving the comment For a long time, most network shows had TEN MINUTES of commercials per hour. This started increasing in the 1980s, and it's now closer to TWENTY MINUTES per hour.
-
1 vote1 comment · CLOSED: How should media companies change their approaches to delivering news and information? · Admin →
An error occurred while saving the comment Since ESPN shows commercials, and LOTS of them, nobody should be paying ANYTHING to get them.
Radio has been virtually ruined since companies have been allowed to own more stations. The most in one city a company used to be able to own was one AM and one FM- now in my area there are 3 companies (CBS, ClearChannel and Entercom) that each own about 5 stations.