Join the Discussion...

There needs to be a counterweight to the "first to break a story" mentality

4 votes
Vote
Sign in
Check!
(thinking…)
Reset
or sign in with
  • facebook
  • google
    Password icon
    I agree to the terms of service
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    sanderssamsanderssam shared this idea  ·   ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    2 comments

    Sign in
    Check!
    (thinking…)
    Reset
    or sign in with
    • facebook
    • google
      Password icon
      I agree to the terms of service
      Signed in as (Sign out)
      Submitting...
      • Rick SantinaRick Santina commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        The most absurd thing I have ever seen is the phenomenon of "Internet Reporters".
        A person sitting in the studio reading Facebook and Twitter feeds over the air is NOT reporting. Verification of key facts and actually investigating and reporting a story are critical. How many more "Balloon Boy" stories do we need to see?

      • sanderssamsanderssam commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        More and more stories are being broken on shakier and shakier evidence. The "Sources report" introduction to a story is the journalistic equivalent of a "Beta" label on a computer program. But it's not taken as such; it's taken as gospel. There needs to be a well-marketed counter, that doesn't lag ridiculously behind the news world, but has fully researched and is confident of its conclusions. Confirmation with greater analysis has to have a market over a one-line story reporting something that can be couched into a stickier headline.

      Feedback and Knowledge Base